I’m supposed to go with my classmates from the ESRI Polytechnic School for Janitorial Vocations to the University of California at Santa Barbara tomorrow… fer something?
Of course, I have no clue what is going on over there. Info is sparse. All I know is that James Fee has a Gateway 2000 Pentium II server with a bunch of ZIP 100MB disks up for grabs and that Jack & Laura are going into a “sphere” with Goodchild and two of my classmates.
Totally sounds like something out of the movie Event Horizon… But worse.
Good thing I’m in ESRI training this week.
Posted in
GeoSpam,
Jack's Pool House,
School,
University of Redlands,
WTF,
Why?,
colloquium,
events,
humor,
rocket science,
spooky
Here at the ESRI Polytechnic Engineering School for the Blind, we have a weekly colloquium where we (the students) and the ESRI staff meet to hear interesting presentations every Wednesday. Today’s colloquium was a presentation from another resident of The Gulag, Dr. John Kimerling of Oregon State fame, presented Dotting the Dot Map. Beware: there’s a dose of math with funny symbols in this one.
From the abstract:
Dot maps show the geographic distribution of features in an area by placing dots representing a certain quantity of features where the features are most likely to occur. The fundamental steps in dot mapping are to select the dot size, determine the dot unit value, and place the correct number of dots in a random manner that correctly reflects the geographic distribution of features.
Selecting the dot size is a subjective decision, but the dot unit value has long been determined with the aid of the Mackay nomograph. Close examination of the nomograph finds it not appropriate for determining the dot unit value when dot placement is based on computer-generated random numbers that result in overlapping dots. A new graphical aid for dot unit value determination was created by modeling aggregate area of dots and amount of dot overlap using a truncated form of the unification equation from probability theory. Aggregate dot areas predicted by this equation were tested against actual random dots created for several common dot sizes, and high agreement was found between measured and predicted aggregate area. The new ESRI Dot Value Estimator was created by Aileen Buckley based on these results.
Pseudo-random dot placement with a maximum overlap constraint for dot pairs appears to better mimic how cartographers have traditionally placed dots. Pseudo-random dot placement can be thought of as similar to rigid random placement of circles in a square with maximum circle overlap limits from 0% (mutually exclusive dots) to 100% (totally random dots). Thinking of dot placement in this manner allowed a general equation for aggregate dot area to be devised as a linear combination of the mutually exclusive and totally random dot endpoint equations. Aggregate areas predicted by this general equation were found to closely match actual assemblages of pseudo-random dots with differing maximum dot pair overlaps.
The second part of this research focused on improving the guidance given for the placement of dots when mapping human population from U.S. Census data. MS GIS students [...] created a series of maps for San Bernardino county that illustrate the improvements in dot placement that result from using progressively smaller Census data collection units, and then using land use information to exclude areas unlikely to contain people. The final refinement was using road buffers as inclusion areas in rural areas.
I point this one out because it is rarely in the geoblogosphere we get techniques in cartography, especially with ESRI GIS technology. Fortunately, there’s the ESRI Mapping Center for those with the ESRI crutch. They even have a blog! I would reference the site quite often for the power GIS user who makes maps as it is chalk full of goodies (scripts) and tricks to get the most—cartographically—out of ArcGIS. As for the mega-cartographer, I would reference information aesthetics, John Krygier’s Making Maps: DIY Cartography, Tom Patterson’s Shaded Relief, and even Edward Tufte’s Ask E.T for more tips and techniques for cartographic and information visualization.
On the same note, and I don’t know if you feel the same way, but it seems as if there is little “art” in our science these days in the GIS and map services world. It could be just me? I’m writing more design and project documentation these days.
Posted in
ESRI,
GIS,
Jack's Pool House,
Maps,
Reference,
School,
Training,
University of Redlands,
cartography,
colloquium,
events,
math,
media
